Lean 4 · theorem extraction · formal claims boundary

What Actually Follows from EFMW-102?

A machine-checked pass over the 102-equation Monolithic EFMW corpus. The result is not “102 proved laws.” It is a smaller, sharper set of mathematical consequences, structural constraints, negative results, and explicit open theorem programs.

Source corpus: enuminous/Monlithic_EFMW_102_Lean4, commit 58f743b · Formal analysis edited by Aristotle (Harmonic)

The result in one sentence

Aristotle extracted about 40 Lean theorems from the EFMW-102 corpus, all under explicit hypotheses, with no sorry in the five analysis modules; these are mathematical consequences of the encoded equations, not evidence that EFMW is physically correct.
102source equations in the Monolithic EFMW corpus
≈40machine-checked laws derived in this analysis
5formal result clusters: Golden, Coherence, Dynamics, Metrics, Fields

The distinction matters. Lean can establish that a theorem follows from definitions and assumptions. It cannot establish that the assumptions describe nature. The empirical gate remains outside the proof assistant.

Five clusters of derived laws

1 · Golden ratio / Scalar-φ

  • Proved φ² = φ + 1 and the Fibonacci power law φⁿ⁺¹ = Fₙ₊₁φ + Fₙ.
  • Proved Closed forms for φ²³, φ⁴⁶, and φ¹³.
  • Proved The φ-tiled operator is a convex weighted combination because φ⁻¹ + φ⁻² = 1.
  • Proved Scalar-23 scaling is invertible.
φ²³ = 28657φ + 17711    ·    φ⁴⁶ = 1836311903φ + 1134903170

2 · Coherence / Red Queen

  • Proved The coherence potential is even and has the stated derivative.
  • Proved For a > 0, equilibria occur at Φ = 0 or Φ² = b/a.
  • Proved A Lyapunov law for the coupling-free, noise-free coherence flow: the potential never increases.
  • Proved A maximum sustainable disorder-load condition for Red Queen equilibrium.
βD − γḊ ≤ αK/4

This inequality is the exact existence criterion, under the theorem’s hypotheses, for an equilibrium of the analyzed Red Queen form.

3 · Relaxation, decay, and emergent time

  • Proved The relaxation equation has the expected unique exponential solution.
  • Proved ME-078 is exactly the corresponding relaxation solution for the specified initial/equilibrium data.
  • Proved Exponential decay has half-life τₙ ln 2.
  • Proved If recursive angular rate is positive, accumulated phase is strictly increasing and can serve as a clock variable.

4 · Metrics

  • Proved The coherence score lies in [0,1] and equals 1 exactly at equality of the compared states.
  • Proved Recursive integrity is bounded above by coherence.
  • Proved Kuramoto order parameter bounds.
  • Proved Gibbs inequality for KL divergence.
  • Proved Phrase entropy bounds, normalized collapse probabilities, existence of a finite Collapse-Ω minimizer, and recursive-risk monotonicity.

5 · Fields, PDE structure, and recursion

  • Proved The covariant scalar operator reduces to the expected Minkowski-space wave operator under the encoded metric conventions.
  • Proved ME-005 has effective time coefficient (1−α²)/c².
  • Proved ME-007 and ME-008 are componentwise equivalent under their stated encoding.
  • Proved Only α+β matters in the analyzed S–O pair, and the two equations are mirror images under exchange.
  • Proved The Chronologos composition becomes an involution under the stated algebraic hypotheses.
  • Proved The encoded accumulation law grows without bound when ΔE·C > 0.

Negative and constraint results

Scalar-23 no-go. Linear Scalar-23 scaling preserves the null state:
S₂₃(0)=0,    S₂₃(X)=0 ⇔ X=0.
Therefore this scaling alone cannot transform a null state into a nonzero state. Any “rebirth” interpretation requires additional nonlinear or external structure.
ME-005 propagation boundary. The analyzed field equation reduces to
((1−α²)/c²) φtt − ∇²φ = source.
At α² = 1, the time-propagation term vanishes and the equation degenerates to a Poisson-type equation. So the encoded expression behaves as a wave equation only on the appropriate side of that parameter boundary.
Bianchi consistency is not automatic. Because the encoded information tensor contains a Ricci term, conservation/consistency requires an additional differential-geometric obligation. It is not supplied merely by writing the Einstein-like equation.

What remains open

AreaStatusMissing obligation
Action principlesOpenFormal metric variation / Euler–Lagrange derivation for ME-001, ME-009, ME-013, ME-014.
Einstein-like consistencyOpenContracted Bianchi / conservation condition in a differential-geometric setting.
Attractors and nonlinear dynamicsOpenExistence, uniqueness, Lyapunov exponent and attractor theorems for ME-022–033.
PDE well-posednessOpenWell-posedness for the cognitive PDE sector, including ME-036/037.
CosmologyOpenA specified metric and full derivation for the rotating Friedmann expression.
Relativistic fluid sectorOpenFormal treatment of ME-077–081.
Empirical claimsEmpiricalME-089–102 require experiments or observational data beyond the algebraic bounds proved here.

Why this pass matters

The value of the Aristotle pass is not that every EFMW equation survived unchanged. The value is that the corpus became more sharply partitioned:

Machine-checked: algebraic identities, bounded metrics, relaxation laws, selected Lyapunov and equilibrium statements, parameter degeneracies, invertibility, and several structural implications.

Not machine-checked as physics: action-to-field derivations, conservation closure, nonlinear existence theory, PDE well-posedness, cosmological modeling, relativistic fluid modeling, and empirical validity.

That boundary is a feature, not a weakness. Formalization tells us exactly where proof ends and scientific validation must begin.